Sunday, May 7, 2023

Stop The Trains From Running On Time

Who does it persuade? Who does it inconvenience? Who does it harm? What does it accomplish?

Jordan Neely is dead, and whether there is any “justice” to be had for him depends on what one considers “justice” and what can be done to prevent the next homeless person on a subway behaving erractically and threateningly from end up dead. To argue that discomforting people is no justification for killing them is a strawman. And there is no shortage of problems raised by the many tragedies represented by Jordan Neely that many of us would like to see changed. It’s not that there are solutions to be had for intransigent problems, contrary to the simpletons, but we could do better.

Instead, a bunch of unduly passionate kids stood on the subway tracks to make sure other people, some of whom are the “oppressed” for whom they’re being delightfully disobedient, can’t get home to their children or to work on time because they’ve decided that the most disruptive thing they can do is make other people’s lives more difficult. And, in the minds of the simplistic, disruption is the end in itself. No justice, no peace. Somehow, no subways makes sense to them.

For those on the subway, the disruption by protestors was not appreciated.

To what end?

No doubt the protesters passionate believed they were serving a cause of existential importance, worth whatever disruption they caused others and entitling them to violate any laws that stood in their way. A theme in Rebecca Brannon’s videos is protesters screaming “why are you touching me” at police, as if they have a right to violate the law and ignore lawful commands without recourse.

On the other hand, they could have spent the day going from subway station to subway station providing food and drink to the homeless. But that wouldn’t be as much fun and make them feel as if they changed the world as they do by stopping subway cars do other people can’t get to work on time.

No comments:

Post a Comment